Is a motion to call a previous question debatable and amendable?

A motion to call for the previous question is designed to end debate on a matter and bring it to an immediate vote. This motion is not debatable because allowing debate could defeat the purpose of expediting the decision-making process. If the motion were debatable, it would prolong discussion rather than shorten it, which is why it is structured to be a straightforward procedural move.

Additionally, the requirement for a two-thirds vote is rooted in parliamentary procedure, as it reflects the need for a significant level of consensus to cut off debate and proceed to voting on the main issue. This ensures that a substantial majority of members agree that it is time to move on, which upholds the integrity of the discussion process in an assembly.

Options that suggest it is debatable or amendable misunderstand the nature of this motion, as both characteristics would contradict its purpose of facilitating a timely conclusion to discussions. Thus, the correct choice emphasizes the straightforward and efficient function of calling for the previous question within parliamentary procedure.