Which statement about motion seconding is false?

The statement that a motion without a second is debated is false because, in parliamentary procedure, a motion must receive a second before it can be opened for debate. The purpose of requiring a second is to demonstrate that at least one other member supports the motion, which is essential for moving the discussion forward. Without a second, the motion does not progress, and thus it cannot be debated.

A second indicates that the motion has merit and is worthy of discussion, setting the stage for further scrutiny and consideration by the group. This ensures an efficient use of meeting time by preventing frivolous or unsupported ideas from being discussed at length.

Understanding this process helps clarify the importance of support within group decision-making and reinforces structured discussions in meetings.